The Economics Behind Air Filter Manufacturing

In the air filter industry, manufacturers face a balancing act between delivering effective filtration and controlling production costs all while planning for shipping expenses. Due to the large physical volume that air filters occupy, shipping costs are high, which is why most air filters sold in the US are manufactured within North America (US, Canada, Mexico) rather than overseas.
This article focuses on pleated cardboard air filters, which are widely used in residential and commercial HVAC systems, rather than proprietary filter solutions. These pleated filters are highly commoditized, which makes the economic trade-offs behind their production and logistics particularly interesting to explore.
Typical pleated cardboard air filter
I’m Winston Mok, the founder and CEO of Woosh Air. Since 2019, I’ve been deeply involved in developing smart & new air filter designs and gaining significant hands-on experience in air filter fabrication and manufacturing processes. Since launching Woosh, we’ve established an official partnership with 3M, a titan in the filtration industry with over 30 years of innovation in air filtration.
Having visited a number of filter manufacturers myself, I’ve had the chance to witness how they make filters, learn about the economics behind the process, and understand the costs associated with each stage of production. I’ve seen firsthand the balancing act manufacturers face between optimizing performance, reducing costs, and meeting customer expectations. This article shares the insights I’ve gained by working with industry players to understand the trade-offs and processes involved in filter manufacturing.
Toward the end of this article, I’ll also share how Woosh air filters fit into this broader landscape. But for now, I thought it would be interesting to start by diving into the fundamental components of air filters, their economics, and how logistics further influence the decisions manufacturers make.
This article uncovers the trade-offs in filter manufacturing and logistics, illustrating how choices around components, labor, and shipping impact both price and performance. Standards like Title 20 can also help consumers make informed choices by revealing the hidden aspects of filter quality.

Components of a Pleated Air Filter

A typical commercial pleated air filter consists of three main components:
1. Frame: The frame secures the filter in the HVAC system and provides structural integrity.
2. Filter Media: The core material capturing airborne particles like dust, pollen, and more.
3. Pleat Support Structure: Holds the filter media in place, maintaining pleats and airflow.
    Diagram showing breakdown of filter construction (source: BNX Filters)
    Understanding these components sets the stage for discussing where manufacturers can reduce costs and how these choices impact filter performance.

    The Frame: Structural Choices and Cost Implications

    While the frame may seem like a minor detail, it greatly affects both cost and filter stability.

    Two-Piece Frames

    Two-piece frames use separate front and back pieces of cardboard, which increases stability. This is valuable when filters experience high airflow or become clogged. However, the added rigidity requires extra material, glues and labor, which adds to production costs.
    Die-cut Paperboard Air Filter 2-Piece Frame

    Single-Piece Frames

    Single-piece frames are cheaper and quicker to produce, as a single piece of cardboard wraps around the media.
    Die-cut Paperboard Air Filter Single Piece Frame
    While cost-effective, these frames are less rigid, increasing the risk of collapsing under dust load, which could release particles back into the HVAC system.
    Example of single-piece framed filter starting to collapse

    Filter Media: The Impact of Pleat Density on Cost and Efficiency

    The Role of Media Density

    The density of the filter media, measured in grams per square meter (gsm), plays a crucial role in determining filtration efficiency. Higher-density media inherently uses more plastic for the same surface area, which increases material costs. However, this added density generally enhances the filter’s ability to capture smaller particles, resulting in improved overall performance. High-performance media, such as those used in electrostatic filters, often rely on optimized density to maximize particle capture rates. While the benefits of higher-density media are clear in terms of filtration efficiency, manufacturers must balance these advantages against the increased material costs and potential impacts on airflow, such as higher pressure drops in some cases.
    Here is an example chart showing the increase in pressure drop for higher density media. As an example, the ‘70’ represents filter media with a density of 70 gsm.
    Hollingsworth & Voss Technostat Filter Media Specifications Sheet (source)

    More Pleats, More Cost

    High-capacity filters, which have more pleats packed into the same external dimension, offer several advantages over standard-capacity filters. The additional pleats increase the internal surface area of the filter media — the total area through which air passes. This greater surface area allows the filter to hold more dust while reducing the initial resistance to airflow, known as pressure drop. Furthermore, the tightly spaced pleats add structural rigidity, enabling the filter to withstand the force of airflow without collapsing and enhancing its durability. This design improves both the filter’s efficiency and its lifespan, even under demanding conditions.
    The primary downside of high-capacity filters is the increased cost. The added pleats require more media, making these filters more expensive to manufacture. While this additional cost can be justified by improved performance and longevity, it represents a significant factor in filter pricing.
    Comparison of Standard Pleat Density vs. High Capacity Pleat Density Filters

    Pleat Support: Wire Backing, Filament Support, and Self-Supporting Materials

    The pleat support structure is a key factor in both the durability and effectiveness of an air filter. There are three primary methods for supporting pleats within a filter:

    Wire Backing

    Wire backing is a sturdy option that provides strong support for pleated media, keeping the structure intact under high airflow. This support prevents pleats from collapsing as they fill with dust, ensuring consistent airflow and filtration efficiency. However, wire backing can add to material costs and manufacturing complexity, which may increase the overall price.
    Example of wirebacking adhered to filter media to provide support to pleats

    Filament Support

    Some manufacturers replace wire backing with plastic filaments that stretch across the tops of the pleats. While this design is cheaper, plastic filaments generally provide less structural support, which may lead to filter collapse under high dust loads. The potential for collapse and dust release makes filament support less ideal for environments with high airflow or significant particle buildup.
    Example of Plastic Filament Across Front Face Pleat Support

    Self-Supporting Materials

    Certain filters are constructed from self-supporting materials, which don’t require additional backing to maintain pleat structure. These materials are strong enough to hold their shape against airflow, eliminating the need for wire or filament support. However, the stiffness required for self-support can result in higher differential pressure, potentially increasing the strain on HVAC systems. While self-supporting filters reduce the need for additional components, the trade-off in airflow restriction is a consideration for both manufacturers and consumers.
    Example of Multi Layer Filter Media with Back Support Layer

    Conversion Costs: From Raw Materials to Finished Filters

    Once raw materials reach the manufacturing site, they undergo conversion processes to become fully assembled filters. This process includes cutting, pleating, assembling, and sealing all components.
    The labor involved in this conversion process varies widely among manufacturers. Smaller, mom-and-pop operations may rely on manual labor for assembly, which can be slower and labor-intensive but offers flexibility for custom adjustments. In contrast, larger manufacturers often employ fully automated systems that streamline production, reducing labor costs and ensuring consistency across large batches.
    Automated assembly lines significantly lower the labor cost per filter, allowing high-volume production with efficiency, while smaller operations may trade efficiency for flexibility.
    Jewett Automation Technologies Helios automated filter assembly machine (Youtube Video)

    Shipping Costs

    Shipping expenses are a significant factor in air filter economics due to the bulky nature of filters. Unlike some products that can be densely packed, filters occupy a large volume relative to their weight. This high shipping cost often makes it impractical to manufacture filters overseas and ship them internationally. Instead, most air filters are produced domestically in the USA, which reduces transit distance and associated costs.

    Shipping from Manufacturer to Retailer

    To address these shipping challenges, manufacturers sometimes design filters to stack compactly, optimizing the space available in shipping containers. By stacking filters effectively, they reduce both the cost of shipping which can otherwise be prohibitively high and storage footprint on store shelves which comes at a premium.
    Comparison of 6 stackable filters vs. 6 regular filters. ~50% reduction in space requirements
    Close-up example of stackable filter design

    Shipping to the Customer

    Shipping air filters directly to customers poses challenges due to their size and fragility. Cardboard filters with wire backing are especially prone to damage since they can’t be compressed, leading to packaging in sturdy, protective boxes. This increases costs and is a common cause of one-star reviews on platforms like Amazon when filters arrive damaged.
    The bulky nature of filters also makes shipping expensive, which is why online sellers often bundle them in packs of 4 to 6 to distribute shipping costs. In contrast, retail stores sell single units as logistics are handled in bulk.
    To address these constraints, companies like FilterEasy (SecondNature) and Woosh have introduced folding filter designs that ship compactly, lowering costs while maintaining high performance when installed. This innovation is particularly valuable for subscription services shipping single filters directly to customers.
    FilterBuy 4-Pack Filter available on Amazon vs. FilterEasy Single Filter Subscription

    Why CA Title 20 Matters for Consumer Awareness

    Due to an emphasis on outward-facing specs like MERV ratings, many consumers base decisions on these values alone, often overlooking performance factors like initial pressure drop or dust-holding capacity. California Title 20 aims to bring transparency to these specifications, helping consumers understand what they’re actually buying. To learn more check out our Title 20: Nutrition Facts for Air Filters blog post.

    The Hidden Costs of “Budget” Filters

    While inexpensive filters may meet basic specifications, their limitations can lead to higher long-term costs. If a filter collapses under high dust load, particles may infiltrate the HVAC system, causing:
    1. Increased maintenance costs due to dust buildup.
    2. Reduced HVAC efficiency, as clogged ducts and coils make it harder for systems to maintain airflow.
    3. Premature system wear, potentially leading to costly repairs or replacements.
        These hidden costs reinforce the importance of quality in air filters, highlighting why transparency in specs like those promoted by Title 20 is crucial for both consumers and manufacturers.

        How Woosh Approaches Filters

        At Woosh, we’ve reimagined air filter design to address the inefficiencies of traditional disposable filters. By combining innovative materials, cutting-edge technology, and sustainable practices, we deliver a superior product that meets both performance and environmental goals.

        Reusable Plastic Frame

        Our filters feature a reusable plastic frame, which offers several advantages:
        Rigidity: Provides structural strength to maintain shape under high airflow conditions.
        Hydrophobic Properties: The plastic frame resists water absorption, ensuring durability in humid environments or during accidental moisture exposure.
        Integrated Electronics: Each frame is equipped with sensors to monitor airflow, pressure drop, and usage, allowing for precise tracking and notifications when the filter needs replacement.
          This reusable design reduces waste and adds longevity to the overall system.

          Foldable, Stackable Filter Media

          The filter media itself is foldable and stackable, introducing several benefits:
          Sustainability: By reducing landfill waste, this approach aligns with growing demands for environmentally friendly solutions.
          Lower Shipping Costs: Foldable filters can be shipped in compact packaging, reducing transportation costs by a significant margin compared to traditional bulky filters.
          Efficient Storage: Stackable designs take up far less space, making them easier to store both during transit and at customer locations.
            Individual Woosh Fold Filter and 20-stack

            3M Filtration Technology

            Woosh leverages 3M’s proprietary filtration media to deliver unmatched performance:
            Low Initial Pressure Drop: Ensures optimal airflow and reduced strain on HVAC systems, improving energy efficiency.
            Maximized Filter Life: When combined with Woosh’s integrated sensors, the filters are used to their full potential, providing customers with the best value for their investment.
              By pairing innovative technology with a customer-centric design, Woosh delivers air filters that are smarter, more sustainable, and cost-effective. Whether it’s for residential or commercial use, our filters represent a step forward in air filtration technology.

              Conclusion: Balancing Cost and Quality in Filter Choices

              This look into filter manufacturing and logistics illustrates why “you get what you pay for” is especially relevant in this industry. Manufacturers carefully balance production economics by making trade-offs in component quality, structure, and assembly. With Title 20 promoting spec transparency, consumers can look beyond price and MERV ratings to select filters that align with their performance needs. By shedding light on these manufacturing decisions and the impact of logistics costs, this article underscores the value of informed buying and the benefits of transparency in a highly commoditized industry.

              Reading next

              Leave a comment

              This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.